System for diagnosing mental disorders using neurometrics

ABSTRACT

Described are novel systems for the diagnosis of specific mental disorders using neurometrics. EEG parameters are compared to thresholds to determine if a person is suffering from autism spectrum disorder, Alzheimer&#39;s disease, anxiety, depression, or schizophrenia.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO A RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 15/087,209, filed Mar. 31, 2016, which is incorporated hereinby reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Mental disorders can be painful, debilitating, and very costly for theaffected individual and their family. Approximately one in five adultsin the US experiences a mental disorder in a given year. 18.1% of adultsin the US experience an anxiety disorder, such as posttraumatic stressdisorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and specific phobias. 6.9% ofadults in the US have at least one major depressive episode each year.1.1% of adults in the US live with schizophrenia.

The consequences of lack of treatment are significant. Mental disordersare the third most common cause of hospitalization in the US for bothyouth and adults aged 18-44. Suicide is the 10^(th) leading cause ofdeath in the US, and the 2^(nd) leading cause of death for those aged15-24. Each day, approximately 18-22 veterans die by suicide.

A key factor in treatment of mental disorders is proper diagnosis. Thestandard method of diagnosing mental disorders has been with either theDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or theInternational Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related HealthProblems (ICD), Chapter 5: Mental and behavioural disorders. Bothstandards primarily involve diagnosis using conversation with thepatient regarding symptoms and behavior. This has the disadvantage ofbeing subjective, based on the interviewer, which lessens the diagnosticreliability, sometimes resulting in two clinicians coming to differentdiagnoses of the same patient.

DSM and ICD are primarily concerned with the signs and symptoms ofmental disorders, rather than the underlying causes. This reflects ageneral lack of pathophysiological understanding of mental disorders.

It is apparent that a repeatable and reliable system for the diagnosisof mental disorders that is based on measurable data, independent of theinterpretation of an interviewer, would provide significant benefit topatients and to the psychiatric community.

SUMMARY

Certain terms are used that are necessary for a better understanding ofthe systems described herein. The definitions of these terms are givenin the detailed description.

Described herein are novel systems to provide a diagnosis of mentaldisorders for a person using characteristics of the person's EEG. Thesystems described herein do not require any measurement other than theEEG, although the systems do not preclude the use of other measurementsin order to confirm or validate the diagnosis. The systems describedherein make use of the measurement locations described in theinternationally recognized 10-20 system, although other, possibly higherresolution, systems could also be used.

In one aspect is a system for diagnosing autism spectrum disorder (ASD)that comprises: (a) an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of aperson; and (b) a processing device comprising a processor and internalor external memory, in order to calculate the average relative AlphaPower of EEG signals from at least one of the frontal EEG channels andthe average relative Alpha Power of EEG signals from at least one of theoccipital-parietal EEG channels; and (c) a diagnosis mechanism where thesystem diagnoses the person with ASD if the average relative frontalAlpha Power is less than about ten percent of the average relativeoccipital-parietal Alpha Power. The diagnosis mechanism can be aprocessor or a hand calculation.

In another aspect is a system for diagnosing ASD that comprises: (a) anEEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person; (b) a processingdevice comprising a processor and internal or external memory, in orderto calculate the average relative Alpha Power of EEG signals from atleast one of the frontal EEG channels and the average relative AlphaPower of EEG signals from at least one of the occipital-parietal EEGchannels; and (c) a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses theperson with ASD if the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less thanabout twenty percent of the average relative occipital-parietal AlphaPower and the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less than about5%. The diagnosis mechanism can be a processor or a hand calculation.

In another aspect is a system for diagnosing ASD that comprises: (a) anEEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person; (b) a processingdevice comprising a processor and internal or external memory, in orderto calculate the average Alpha Frequency of EEG signals from at leastone of the frontal EEG channels and the average Alpha Frequency of EEGsignals from at least one of the occipital-parietal EEG channels; and(c) a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person with ASDif the average frontal Alpha Frequency is greater than about 0.5 Hz morethan the average occipital-parietal Alpha Frequency. The diagnosismechanism can be a processor or a hand calculation.

The aspects described may be used individually or as a combination. Byrequiring more than one metric to be satisfied for a diagnosis, theconfidence of the diagnosis may improve.

In some embodiments of at least one aspect described above, the systemdiagnoses the person with ASD if the average relative frontal AlphaPower is less than about ten percent of the average relativeoccipital-parietal Alpha Power and the average relative frontal AlphaPower is less than about 5%.

In some embodiments of at least one aspect described above, the systemdiagnoses the person with ASD if the average relative frontal AlphaPower is less than about ten percent of the average relativeoccipital-parietal Alpha Power and the average frontal Alpha Frequencyis greater than about 0.5 Hz more than the average occipital-parietalAlpha Frequency. In some embodiments of at least one aspect describedabove, the system diagnoses the person with ASD if the average relativefrontal Alpha Power is less than about twenty percent of the averagerelative occipital-parietal Alpha Power and the average relative frontalAlpha Power is less than about 5% and the average frontal AlphaFrequency is greater than about 0.5 Hz more than the averageoccipital-parietal Alpha Frequency.

In one aspect is a system for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease thatcomprises: (a) an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of aperson; (b) a processing device comprising a processor and internal orexternal memory, in order to calculate the average dominant frequencybetween about 5 Hz and 15 Hz of EEG signals from at least one EEGchannel; and (c) a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses theperson with Alzheimer's Disease if the average dominant frequency isless than about 8 Hz. The diagnosis mechanism can be a processor or ahand calculation.

In another aspect is a system for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease thatcomprises: (a) an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of aperson; (b) a processing device comprising a processor and internal orexternal memory, in order to calculate the average dominant frequencybetween about 5 Hz and 15 Hz of EEG signals from at least one EEGchannel and the average coherence at the dominant frequency between theEEG signals from at least one frontal EEG channel and at least oneoccipital-parietal EEG channel; and (c) a diagnosis mechanism where thesystem diagnoses the person with Alzheimer's Disease if the averagecoherence is less than about 10%. The diagnosis mechanism can be aprocessor or a hand calculation.

In some embodiments of at least one aspect described above, the systemdiagnoses the person with Alzheimer's disease if the dominant frequencyis less than about 8 Hz and the average coherence is less than about10%.

In one aspect is a system for diagnosing Anxiety Disorder thatcomprises: (a) an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of aperson; (b) a processing device comprising a processor and internal orexternal memory, in order to calculate the average entropy of the EEGsignals from at least one EEG channel; and (c) a diagnosis mechanismwhere the system diagnoses the person with Anxiety Disorder if theaverage entropy is greater than about 0.7. The diagnosis mechanism canbe a processor or a hand calculation.

In one aspect is a system for diagnosing Depression that comprises: (a)an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person; (b) aprocessing device comprising a processor and internal or externalmemory, in order to calculate the average relative Alpha Power of atleast one frontal EEG channel and the average relative Alpha Power of atleast one occipital-parietal EEG channel; and (c) a diagnosis mechanismwhere the system diagnoses the person with Depression if the averagerelative frontal Alpha Power is greater than the average relativeoccipital-parietal Alpha Power. The diagnosis mechanism can be aprocessor or a hand calculation.

In another aspect is a system for diagnosing Depression that comprises:(a) an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person; (b) aprocessing device comprising a processor and internal or externalmemory, in order to calculate the average frontal Alpha Frequency of EEGsignals from at least one frontal EEG channel; and (c) a diagnosismechanism where the system diagnoses the person with Depression if theaverage relative Q-factor about the average frontal Alpha Frequency ofEEG signals from at least one frontal EEG channel is greater than about8. The diagnosis mechanism can be a processor or a hand calculation.

In some embodiments of at least one aspect described above, the systemdiagnoses the person with Depression if the average relative frontalAlpha Power is greater than the average relative occipital-parietalAlpha Power and the average relative Q factor is greater than about 8.

In one aspect is a system for diagnosing Schizophrenia that comprises:(a) an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person; (b) aprocessing device comprising a processor and internal or externalmemory, in order to calculate the average dominant frequency f_(d)between about 5 Hz and 15 Hz of EEG signals from at least one EEGchannel, the average lower dominant frequency between about 5 Hz andabout f_(d)−1 Hz of EEG signals from at least one EEG channel, and theaverage upper dominant frequency between about f_(d)+1 Hz and about 15Hz of EEG signals from at least one EEG channel; and (c) a diagnosismechanism where the system diagnoses the person with Schizophrenia ifthe magnitude of the average power spectrum from at least one EEGchannel at the lower dominant frequency is at least about 80% of themagnitude of the average power spectrum from at least one EEG channel atthe dominant frequency or the magnitude of the average power spectrumfrom at least one EEG channel at the upper dominant frequency is atleast about 80% of the magnitude of the average power spectrum from atleast one EEG channel at the dominant frequency. The diagnosis mechanismcan be a processor or a hand calculation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A better understanding of the features and advantages of the systemsprovided will be obtained by reference to the following detaileddescription that sets forth illustrative embodiments and theaccompanying drawings of which:

FIG. 1 shows an exemplary system in which a diagnosis of autism isdetermined based upon the relative Alpha Power of the frontal EEGchannels and the occipital-parietal EEG channels, or based upon thedifference between the frontal alpha frequency and theoccipital-parietal alpha frequency.

FIG. 2 shows an exemplary system in which a diagnosis of Alzheimer'sdisease is determined based upon the dominant frequency between 5 Hz-15Hz, or based upon the EEG coherence between the Fz and Pz locations.

FIG. 3 shows an exemplary system in which a diagnosis of anxiety isdetermined based upon the average entropy across all EEG channels.

FIG. 4 shows an exemplary system in which a diagnosis of depression isdetermined based upon the EEG Alpha Power at Fz and Pz, or upon theQ-factor about the EEG alpha frequency at the Fz location.

FIG. 5 shows an exemplary system in which a diagnosis of schizophreniais determined based upon the presence of multiple peaks in the FFT ofthe EEG channels greater than 1 Hz apart.

FIG. 6 shows an exemplary 2-D plot of the average relative Alpha Powerdistribution across all EEG channels for a person with ASD compared to anormal person.

FIG. 7 shows an exemplary graph of the FFT for all EEG channels for aperson with ASD compared to a normal person, showing that the dominantpeak frequency in the frontal EEG channels for a person with ASD isgreater than 0.5 Hz higher than the dominant peak frequency of theoccipital-parietal EEG channels, whereas the dominant peak frequency inthe frontal EEG channels for a normal person is not higher than thedominant peak frequency of the occipital-parietal EEG channels.

FIG. 8 shows an exemplary graph of the FFT for all EEG channels for aperson with mild Alzheimer's disease and a person with severeAlzheimer's disease, showing that the dominant frequency in both casesis less than 8 Hz.

FIG. 9 shows an exemplary graph of the FFT for all EEG channels for aperson with anxiety compared to a normal person, showing that theaverage entropy across all EEG channels is much higher for a person withanxiety.

FIG. 10 shows an exemplary 2-D plot of the distribution of Alpha Poweracross all EEG channels for a person with depression compared to anormal person, showing that the Alpha Power in the frontal EEG channelsis higher than the Alpha Power in the occipital-parietal EEG channelsfor a person with depression.

FIG. 11 shows an exemplary graph of the FFT for all EEG channels for aperson with schizophrenia compared to a normal person, showing that theFFT for a person with schizophrenia contains two significant dominantpeaks more than 1 Hz apart.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

While certain embodiments have been provided and described herein, itwill be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that suchembodiments are provided by way of example only. It should be understoodthat various alternatives to the embodiments described herein may beemployed, and are part of the invention described herein.

Described herein are systems for diagnosing mental disorders usingcharacteristics of the EEG of a person. The systems described hereininclude diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Alzheimer'sdisease, anxiety, depression, and schizophrenia. The mental disordersdescribed herein also encompass all subtypes derived from the mentaldisorder. For example, diagnosis of anxiety also comprises diagnosis ofbulimia, anorexia nervosa, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumaticstress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and panic disorder.Diagnosis of ASD also comprises diagnosis of Asperger's syndrome andchildhood disintegrative disorder. Diagnosis of depression alsocomprises diagnosis of dysthymia, bipolar depression, seasonaldepressive disorder, and depressive episode. Diagnosis of schizophreniaalso comprises diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia, disorganizedschizophrenia, and catatonic schizophrenia. Diagnosis of Alzheimer'sdisease also comprises diagnosis of inflammatory, non-inflammatory, andcortical Alzheimer's disease, as well as dementia and mild cognitiveimpairment.

The term “diagnosis,” when referring to the systems described herein, isthe identification of the nature of a mental disorder by EEG analysiswhere the confidence that the diagnosis is correct is at least 90%.

The term “Fast Fourier Transform,” or FFT, when referring to the systemsdescribed herein, is the calculation algorithm to determine thefrequency spectrum of a signal from an EEG channel.

The term “Alpha Power,” when referring to the systems described herein,is the sum of the magnitude squared of the FFT values in the alpha range(about 8 Hz to about 13 Hz).

The term “total power,” when referring to the systems described herein,is the sum of the magnitude squared of the FFT values across thefrequency spectrum from about 0 Hz to about half the sampling frequency.

The term “relative Alpha Power,” when referring to the systems describedherein, is the Alpha Power divided by the total power.

The term “average relative Alpha Power,” when referring to the systemsdescribed herein, is the average value of the relative Alpha Power forat least one of the EEG channels.

The term “dominant frequency,” when referring to the systems describedherein, is the frequency associated with the highest spectral densitywithin a specified range.

The term “alpha frequency,” when referring to the systems describedherein, is the dominant frequency within the alpha range.

The term “10-20 system,” when referring to the systems described herein,is the internationally recognized method to describe the location ofscalp electrodes in the context of an EEG recording. The locations aredivided into frontal, central, temporal, parietal, and occipitalregions. Each location has a label, based on the region where it islocated.

The term “frontal channels,” when referring to the systems describedherein, is the set of EEG channels in locations above the frontal andpre-frontal region of the brain. For example, in the 10-20 system, thefrontal channels comprise Fp1, Fp2, Fz, F3, F4, F7, and F8.

The term “occipital-parietal channels,” when referring to the systemsdescribed herein, is the set of EEG channels in locations above theoccipital and parietal regions of the brain. For example, in the 10-20system, the occipital-parietal channels comprise Pz, P3, P4, O1, and O2.

The term “coherence,” when referring to the systems described herein, isused to quantify common frequencies and evaluate the similarity of twosignals. It is determined by dividing the magnitude-squaredcross-spectral density between the two signals by the product of thespectral density of each signal at the frequency of interest.

The term “spectral density,” when referring to the systems describedherein, is a measure of the power of an EEG signal at a specifiedfrequency, and is the Fourier transform of the auto-correlation functionof the signal.

The term, “cross-spectral density,” when referring to the systemsdescribed herein, is the Fourier transform of the cross-correlation oftwo EEG signals.

The term, “total spectral power,” when referring to the systemsdescribed herein, is the total energy of an EEG signal, and is the sumof the spectral density over all frequencies.

The term “entropy,” when referring to the systems described herein, is ameasure of the system complexity. A high entropy EEG signal is a resultof a large number of processes occurring in the brain. Entropy isdetermined for an EEG signal in two stages. First a normalized powerspectrum is generated by dividing the spectral density by the totalspectral power, as shown in the equation below:

${S_{n}(f)} = \frac{S(f)}{\sum\limits_{f}\; {S(f)}}$

where S_(n) is the normalized power spectrum and S is the spectraldensity. Then, the entropy is calculated as the sum across the frequencyspectrum from 0 Hz to half the sampling frequency of the normalizedspectrum multiplied by the log base two of the inverse power spectrum,as shown in the equation below:

where E is the entropy.

$E = {\sum\limits_{f}\; {{S_{n}(f)}\log_{2}\frac{1}{S_{n}(f)}}}$

The term “Q-factor,” when referring to the systems described herein, isa measure of the frequency selectivity of the EEG signal about aspecified frequency. A high Q-factor signal has a spectral distributionthat is concentrated around the specified frequency, whereas a lowQ-factor signal has a spectral distribution that is more widely spreadabout the specified frequency. Q-factor is calculated as the specifiedfrequency divided by the half-power bandwidth. The half-power bandwidthis the width of the power spectrum at half the power spectrum value atthe specified frequency.

As used herein, reference to “a hand calculation” refers to one thatdoes not require a processor. Thus, the hand calculation can be done by,for example, a person making mathematical calculations and/ordetermining if one number is larger or smaller than another numberand/or whether a number falls within a certain range.

Described herein are systems for diagnosing one or more mental disordersin a person using characteristics of the EEG of a person, which mayinclude, but do not necessarily require, additional information, such asinformation regarding the person's symptoms, demographic data, genomeanalysis, vital signs, treatment history, or current medication.

The brain may be thought of as a physical system, where the goal, inaddition to providing thought processes and autonomic function, includesminimization of energy consumption. The brain processes are broughtabout through electrochemical signaling between neurons. Thiselectrochemical signaling is not random, but instead often occurs at ornear a specified frequency. Therefore, the brain may also be thought ofas a pseudo-resonant system, with the resonant frequency equal to itsalpha frequency, or dominant EEG frequency between about 8 Hz to about13 Hz.

A resonant system is lower energy than a non-resonant system, and it isthis resonance that contributes to the minimization of energyconsumption by the brain. Therefore, in the brain a tradeoff existsbetween complex neuronal behavior provided for rational thought andother processes the brain must serve, and minimization of energyconsumed by the brain. When the characteristics of resonant activity ofthe brain are altered from their “normal” values, symptoms of mentalorders may occur, based in part on the particular change in the EEGcharacteristics.

If the relative Alpha Power of the frontal region of the brain issignificantly reduced compared to the Alpha Power in theoccipital-parietal region, symptoms of ASD may occur, and a diagnosis ofASD is appropriate. Often, the alpha frequency measured in theoccipital-parietal region of the brain is different than the alphafrequency in the frontal region of the brain. It is not uncommon for theoccipital-parietal alpha frequency to be up to 1 Hz higher than thefrontal alpha frequency. However, if the frontal alpha frequency is morethan 0.5 Hz higher than the occipital-parietal alpha frequency, thensymptoms of ASD may also occur, and a diagnosis of ASD is appropriate.If both EEG characteristics occur together, the confidence in thediagnosis may increase.

In one aspect the invention provides systems for diagnosing autismspectrum disorder (ASD) that comprise: (a) an EEG recording device forrecording the EEG of a person; (b) a processing device comprising aprocessor and internal or external memory, in order to calculate theaverage relative Alpha Power of EEG signals from at least one of thefrontal EEG channels and the average relative Alpha Power of EEG signalsfrom at least one of the occipital-parietal EEG channels; and (c) adiagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person with ASD ifthe average relative frontal Alpha Power is less than about ten percentof the average relative occipital-parietal Alpha Power. The diagnosismechanism can be a processor or hand calculation.

In another aspect is a system for diagnosing ASD that comprises: (a) anEEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person; (b) a processingdevice comprising a processor and internal or external memory, in orderto calculate the average relative Alpha Power of EEG signals from atleast one of the frontal EEG channels and the average relative AlphaPower of EEG signals from at least one of the occipital-parietal EEGchannels; and (c) a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses theperson with ASD if the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less thanabout twenty percent of the average relative occipital-parietal AlphaPower and the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less than about5%. The diagnosis mechanism can be a processor or a hand calculation.

In another aspect is a system for diagnosing ASD that comprises: (a) anEEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person; (b) a processingdevice comprising a processor and internal or external memory, in orderto calculate the average alpha frequency of EEG signals from at leastone of the frontal EEG channels and the average alpha frequency of EEGsignals from at least one of the occipital-parietal EEG channels; and(c) a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person with ASDif the average frontal alpha frequency is greater than about 0.5 Hz morethan the average occipital-parietal alpha frequency. The diagnosismechanism can be a processor or a hand calculation.

The aspects described may be used individually or as a combination. Byrequiring more than one metric to be satisfied for a diagnosis, thesensitivity of the diagnosis may improve.

In some embodiments of at least one aspect described above, the systemdiagnoses the person with ASD if the average relative frontal AlphaPower is less than about 10% of the average relative occipital-parietalAlpha Power and the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less thanabout 5%.

In some embodiments of at least one aspect described above, the systemdiagnoses the person with ASD if the average relative frontal AlphaPower is less than about 10% of the average relative occipital-parietalAlpha Power and the average frontal alpha frequency is greater thanabout 0.5 Hz more than the average occipital-parietal alpha frequency.

In some embodiments of at least one aspect described above, the systemdiagnoses the person with ASD if the average relative frontal AlphaPower is less than about 20% of the average relative occipital-parietalAlpha Power and the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less thanabout 5% and the average frontal Alpha Frequency is greater than about0.5 Hz more than the average occipital-parietal Alpha Frequency.

The dominant frequency in the range between about 5 Hz to about 15 Hz,in normal individuals who are awake, relaxed, with eyes closed, is equalto the alpha frequency. The alpha frequency has a normal range between 8Hz-13 Hz, but if the alpha frequency drops below 8 Hz, then symptoms ofdementia, mild cognitive impairment, or Alzheimer's may occur. Inaddition, these symptoms may occur if the coherence of brain EEGactivity between the frontal and occipital-parietal regions of the braindrops to a low value, resulting in reduced communication between theregions of the brain and reduced cognitive performance. In either case,a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease is appropriate.

In one aspect the subject invention provides a system for diagnosingAlzheimer's disease that comprises: (a) an EEG recording device forrecording the EEG of a person; (b) a processing device comprising aprocessor and internal or external memory, in order to calculate theaverage dominant frequency between about 5 Hz and 15 Hz of EEG signalsfrom at least one EEG channel; and (c) a diagnosis mechanism where thesystem diagnoses the person with Alzheimer's Disease if the averagedominant frequency is less than about 8 Hz. The diagnosis mechanism canbe a processor or a hand calculation.

In another aspect is a system for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease thatcomprises: (a) an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of aperson; (b) a processing device comprising a processor and internal orexternal memory, in order to calculate the average dominant frequencybetween about 5 Hz and 15 Hz of EEG signals from at least one EEGchannel and the average coherence at the dominant frequency between theEEG signals from at least one frontal EEG channel and at least oneoccipital-parietal EEG channel; and (c) a diagnosis mechanism where thesystem diagnoses the person with Alzheimer's Disease if the averagecoherence is less than about 10%. The diagnosis mechanism can be aprocessor or a hand calculation.

In some embodiments of at least one aspect described above, the systemdiagnoses the person with Alzheimer's disease if the dominant frequencyis less than about 8 Hz and the average coherence is less than about10%.

The EEG of someone awake, relaxed, with eyes closed is normallyrhythmic, with most of the energy in the signal centered around thatalpha frequency. If the brain activity is more chaotic and containsenergy that is distributed widely across multiple frequency bands, theperson may have symptoms of anxiety, and an anxiety diagnosis isappropriate. The frequency distribution can be measured by determiningthe entropy of the power spectrum across all EEG channels. If theentropy is high, then an autism diagnosis is appropriate.

In one aspect is a system for diagnosing Anxiety Disorder thatcomprises: (a) an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of aperson; (b) a processing device comprising a processor and internal orexternal memory, in order to calculate the average entropy of the EEGsignals from at least one EEG channel; and (c) a diagnosis mechanismwhere the system diagnoses the person with Anxiety Disorder if theaverage entropy is greater than about 0.7. The diagnosis mechanism canbe a processor or a hand calculation.

In a normal person, the Alpha Power is concentrated around the posteriorportion of the brain, with less Alpha Power present in the frontalregion. If the concentration of Alpha Power is farther anterior in thebrain, then the person may experience symptoms of depression, requiringa depression diagnosis. In addition, the brain of a depressed personwill often be highly rhythmic, and therefore have lower energy. A highlyrhythmic brain can be shown by calculating the Q-factor of the EEGsignal. A high Q-factor in the frontal region of the brain may result insymptoms of depression, and a depression diagnosis is appropriate.

In one aspect is a system for diagnosing Depression that comprises: (a)an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person; (b) aprocessing device comprising a processor and internal or externalmemory, in order to calculate the average relative Alpha Power of atleast one frontal EEG channel and the average relative Alpha Power of atleast one occipital-parietal EEG channel; and (c) a diagnosis mechanismwhere the system diagnoses the person with Depression if the averagerelative frontal Alpha Power is greater than the average relativeoccipital-parietal Alpha Power. The diagnosis mechanism can be aprocessor or a hand calculation.

In another aspect is a system for diagnosing Depression that comprises:(a) an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person; (b) aprocessing device comprising a processor and internal or externalmemory, in order to calculate the average frontal Alpha Frequency of EEGsignals from at least one frontal EEG channel; and (c) a diagnosismechanism where the system diagnoses the person with Depression if theaverage relative Q-factor about the average frontal Alpha Frequency ofEEG signals from at least one frontal EEG channel is greater than about8. The diagnosis mechanism can be a processor or a hand calculation.

In some embodiments of at least one aspect described above, the systemdiagnoses the person with Depression if the average relative frontalAlpha Power is greater than the average relative occipital-parietalAlpha Power and the average relative Q factor is greater than about 8.

Normally, the power spectrum of the EEG of a person contains a singledominant frequency when relaxed, awake, with eyes closed, which is thealpha frequency. This frequency can be different between theoccipital-parietal and frontal portions of the brain. However, if theEEG of the person contains multiple dominant frequencies at least about1 Hz apart, each being of similar power, then the person may experiencesymptoms of schizophrenia, and is given a schizophrenia diagnosis.

In one aspect is a system for diagnosing Schizophrenia that comprises:(a) an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person; (b) aprocessing device comprising a processor and internal or externalmemory, in order to calculate the average dominant frequency (f_(d))between about 5 Hz and 15 Hz of EEG signals from at least one EEGchannel, the average lower dominant frequency between about 5 Hz andabout f_(d)−1 Hz of EEG signals from at least one EEG channel, and theaverage upper dominant frequency between about f_(d)+1 Hz and about 15Hz of EEG signals from at least one EEG channel; and (c) a diagnosismechanism where the system diagnoses the person with Schizophrenia ifthe magnitude of the average power spectrum from at least one EEGchannel at the lower dominant frequency is at least about 80% themagnitude of the average power spectrum from at least one EEG channel atthe dominant frequency or the magnitude of the average power spectrumfrom at least one EEG channel at the upper dominant frequency is atleast about 80% the magnitude of the average power spectrum from atleast one EEG channel at the dominant frequency. The diagnosis mechanismcan be a processor or a hand calculation.

FIG. 1 shows an exemplary flow diagram of a system to diagnose ASD. Inthis example, the EEG of the person is recorded (101) and the averagerelative Alpha Power of the frontal channels and occipital-parietalchannels is found (102). If the frontal power is less than 10% theoccipital-parietal power (103), then an ASD diagnosis is made (107).Otherwise, the criteria is changed such that if the frontal power isless than 20% the occipital-parietal power and the frontal power is lessthan 5% (104), then an ASD diagnosis is made. If both of these criteriaare not met, the average alpha frequency for the frontal EEG channelsand the occipital-parietal channels is calculated (105), and an ASDdiagnosis is made if the frontal alpha frequency is at least 0.5 Hzgreater than the occipital-parietal alpha frequency. If no criteria aremet, then an ASD diagnosis is not appropriate (108).

FIG. 2 shows an exemplary flow diagram of the system to diagnoseAlzheimer's disease.

In this example, the EEG of the person is recorded (201) and the averagedominant frequency between about 5 Hz and about 15 Hz across allchannels is determined (202). If the dominant frequency is less than 8.0Hz (203), then a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease is made (206).Otherwise, the coherence between the Fz EEG channel and the Pz EEGchannel is found at the dominant frequency (204), and an Alzheimer'sdiagnosis is made if the coherence is less than 0.1 (205). If nocriteria are met, then an Alzheimer's diagnosis is not appropriate(207).

FIG. 3 shows an exemplary flow diagram of the system to diagnoseanxiety. In this example, the EEG of the person is recorded (301) andthe entropy of each EEG channel is determined (302) and the average ofthose values is found (303). If this average is greater than 0.7 (304),an anxiety diagnosis is made (305). If not, then an anxiety diagnosis isnot appropriate (306).

FIG. 4 shows an exemplary flow diagram of the system to diagnosedepression. In this example, the EEG of the person is recorded,specifically at locations Fz and Pz (401). The Alpha Power at Fz and Pzis determined (402), and a depression diagnosis is made (407) if thealpha power at Fz is greater than the alpha power at Pz (403), then adepression diagnosis is made (407). Otherwise, the alpha frequency at Fzis found (404) and the Q-factor is determined at Fz about the alphafrequency (405), and a depression diagnosis is made if the Q-factor isgreater than 8 (406). If no criteria are met, a depression diagnosis isnot appropriate (408).

FIG. 5 shows an exemplary flow diagram of the system to diagnoseschizophrenia. In this example, the EEG of the person is recorded at Fz(501), and the average power spectrum across all channels is found forthe EEG at this location (502). The average dominant frequency isdetermined between 5 Hz-15 Hz across all channels (503). The averageupper dominant frequency is found as the average dominant frequencybetween the dominant frequency+1 Hz and 15 Hz (504). The average lowerdominant frequency is found as the average dominant frequency between 5Hz and the dominant frequency+1 Hz (505). If the magnitude of the powerspectrum at the lower dominant frequency is at least 80% the magnitudeof the power spectrum at the dominant frequency (506), then aschizophrenia diagnosis is made (508). If the magnitude of the powerspectrum at the upper dominant frequency is at least 80% the magnitudeof the power spectrum at the dominant frequency (507), then aschizophrenia diagnosis is also made. Otherwise, a schizophreniadiagnosis is not appropriate (509).

FIG. 6 shows an exemplary 2-D plot of the average relative alpha powerdistribution across all EEG channels for a person with ASD (601) and anormal person (602). In the plots, the nose is at the top of the plot.The lighter regions in the plot show higher relative alpha power. As canbe seen, in the normal person plot, the alpha power in the frontalregion (605) is less than in the occipital parietal region (606), thoughnot dramatically so. However, in the ASD person's plot, the alpha powerin the frontal region (603) is less than 10% of the alpha power in theoccipital-parietal region (604).

FIG. 7 shows an exemplary graph of the FFT for all EEG channels for aperson with ASD (701) compared to a normal person (702). For the personwith ASD, it can be seen that the dominant frequency in the occipitalparietal region (703) is 10.0 Hz, and the dominant frequency in thefrontal region (704) is 10.7 Hz. In this, the alpha frequency in thefrontal region is higher than in the occipital-parietal region. For thenormal person, however, the reverse is true. The dominant frequency inthe frontal region (705) is 9.1 Hz, and the dominant frequency in theoccipital-parietal region (706) is 9.56 Hz.

FIG. 8 shows an exemplary graph of the FFT for all EEG channels for aperson with mild Alzheimer's disease (801) and a person with severeAlzheimer's disease (802). The alpha frequency for the person with mildAlzheimer's disease (803) is 7.7 Hz. The alpha frequency for the personwith severe Alzheimer's disease (804) is 5.3 Hz. Both are less than 8.0Hz, which would result in an Alzheimer's diagnosis.

FIG. 9 shows an exemplary graph of the FFT for all EEG channels for aperson with anxiety (901) compared to a normal person (902). In this,the distribution of activity (903) for the person with anxiety covers amuch wider spectral range, resulting in a higher entropy value, whereasthe distribution of activity (904) for the normal person is much moreconcentrated about the alpha frequency, and therefore has a lowerentropy value.

FIG. 10 shows an exemplary 2-D plot of the distribution of Alpha Poweracross all EEG channels for a person with depression (1001) compared toa normal person (1002). In the plots, the nose is at the top of theplot. The lighter regions in the plot show higher Alpha Power. For thedepressed person, the frontal Alpha Power (1003) is higher than theoccipital-parietal Alpha Power (1004), indicating a diagnosis ofdepression. For the normal person, the frontal Alpha Power (1005) isless than occipital-parietal Alpha Power (1006).

FIG. 11 shows an exemplary graph of the FFT for all EEG channels for aperson with schizophrenia (1101) compared to a normal person (1102). Inthis, two dominant peaks exist for the person with schizophrenia, one at10.5 Hz (1104) and one at 8.1 Hz (1103). For the normal person, only onedominant peak (1105) exists, with no peak in another region in the 5-15Hz band (1106).

Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout thedescription and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and thelike are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to anexclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in a sense of “including,but not limited to.” Words using the singular or plural number alsoinclude the plural or singular number respectively. Additionally, thewords “herein,” “hereunder,” “above,” “below,” and words of similarimport refer to this application as a whole and not to any particularportions of this application. When the word “or” is used in reference toa list of two or more items, that word covers all of the followinginterpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of theitems in the list and any combination of the items in the list.

The above descriptions of illustrated embodiments of the system ordevices are not intended to be exhaustive or to be limited to theprecise form disclosed. While specific embodiments of, and examples for,the system or devices are described herein for illustrative purposes,various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of thesystem or devices, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize.The teachings of the system or devices provided herein can be applied toother processing systems or devices, not only for the systems or devicesdescribed.

The elements and acts of the various embodiments described can becombined to provide further embodiments. These and other changes can bemade to the system in light of the above detailed description.

In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not beconstrued to limit the system or devices to the specific embodimentsdisclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construedto include all processing systems that operate under the claims.Accordingly, the system and devices are not limited by the disclosure,but instead the scopes of the system or devices are to be determinedentirely by the claims.

While certain aspects of the system or devices are presented below incertain claim forms, the inventor contemplates the various aspects ofthe system or devices in any number of claim forms. Accordingly, theinventors reserve the right to add additional claims after filing theapplication to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects ofthe system or devices.

Exemplary Embodiments

Specific embodiments of the invention include the following:

-   1. A system for diagnosing autism spectrum disorder (ASD), wherein    the system comprises:    -   a. an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person;    -   b. a processing device comprising a processor and internal or        external memory, in order to calculate the average relative        Alpha Power of EEG signals from at least one of the frontal EEG        channels and the average relative Alpha Power of EEG signals        from at least one of the occipital-parietal EEG channels; and    -   c. a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person        with ASD if the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less        than about 10% of the average relative occipital-parietal Alpha        Power.-   2. The system of embodiment 1 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a    processor.-   3. The system of embodiment 1 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is    hand calculation.-   4. A system for diagnosing ASD, wherein the system comprises:    -   a. an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person;    -   b. a processing device comprising a processor and internal or        external memory, in order to calculate the average relative        Alpha Power of EEG signals from at least one of the frontal EEG        channels and the average relative Alpha Power of EEG signals        from at least one of the occipital-parietal EEG channels; and    -   c. a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person        with ASD if the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less        than about 20% of the average relative occipital-parietal Alpha        Power and the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less than        about 5%.-   5. The system of embodiment 4 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a    processor.-   6. The system of embodiment 4 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is    hand calculation-   7. A system for diagnosing ASD, wherein the system comprises:    -   a. an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person;    -   b. a processing device comprising a processor and internal or        external memory, in order to calculate the average Alpha        Frequency of EEG signals from at least one of the frontal EEG        channels and the average Alpha Frequency of EEG signals from at        least one of the occipital-parietal EEG channels; and    -   c. a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person        with ASD if the average frontal Alpha Frequency is greater than        about 0.5 Hz more than the average occipital-parietal Alpha        Frequency.-   8. The system of embodiment 7 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a    processor.-   9. The system of embodiment 7 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is    hand calculation.-   10. A system of embodiment 1 or 4 wherein the system diagnoses the    person with ASD if the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less    than about 10% of the average relative occipital-parietal Alpha    Power and the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less than    about 5%.-   11. A system of embodiment 1 or 7 wherein the system diagnoses the    person with ASD if the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less    than about 10% of the average relative occipital-parietal Alpha    Power and the average frontal Alpha Frequency is greater than about    0.5 Hz more than the average occipital-parietal Alpha Frequency.-   12. A system of embodiment 4 or 7 wherein the system diagnoses the    person with ASD if the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less    than about 20% of the average relative occipital-parietal Alpha    Power and the average relative frontal Alpha Power is less than    about 5% and the average frontal Alpha Frequency is greater than    about 0.5 Hz more than the average occipital-parietal Alpha    Frequency.-   13. A system for diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease, wherein the system    comprises:    -   a. an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person;    -   b. a processing device comprising a processor and internal or        external memory, in order to calculate the average dominant        frequency between about 5 Hz and 15 Hz of EEG signals from at        least one EEG channel; and    -   c. a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person        with Alzheimer's Disease if the average dominant frequency is        less than about 8 Hz.-   14. The system of embodiment 13 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a    processor.-   15. The system of embodiment 13 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is    hand calculation.-   16. A system for diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease which comprises:    -   a. an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person;    -   b. a processing device comprising a processor and internal or        external memory, in order to calculate the average dominant        frequency between about 5 Hz and 15 Hz of EEG signals from at        least one EEG channel and the average coherence at the dominant        frequency between the EEG signals from at least one frontal EEG        channel and at least one occipital-parietal EEG channel; and    -   c. a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person        with Alzheimer's Disease if the average coherence is less than        about 10%.-   17. The system of embodiment 16 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a    processor.-   18. The system of embodiment 16 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is    hand calculation.-   19. A system of embodiment 13 or 16 wherein the system diagnoses the    person with Alzheimer's Disease if the dominant frequency is less    than about 8 Hz and the average coherence is less than about 10%.-   20. A system for diagnosing Anxiety Disorder, wherein the system    comprises:    -   a. an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person;    -   b. a processing device comprising a processor and internal or        external memory, in order to calculate the average entropy of        the EEG signals from at least one EEG channel; and    -   c. a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person        with Anxiety Disorder if the average entropy is greater than        about 0.7.-   21. The system of embodiment 20 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a    processor.-   22. The system of embodiment 20 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is    hand calculation.-   23. A system for diagnosing Depression, wherein the system    comprises:    -   a. an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person;    -   b. a processing device comprising a processor and internal or        external memory, in order to calculate the average relative        Alpha Power of at least one frontal EEG channel and the average        relative Alpha Power of at least one occipital-parietal EEG        channel; and    -   c. a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person        with Depression if the average relative frontal Alpha Power is        greater than the average relative occipital-parietal Alpha        Power.-   24. The system of embodiment 23 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a    processor.-   25. The system of embodiment 23 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is    hand calculation.-   26. A system for diagnosing Depression, wherein the system    comprises:    -   a. an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person;    -   b. a processing device comprising a processor and internal or        external memory, in order to calculate the average frontal Alpha        Frequency of EEG signals from at least one frontal EEG channel;        and    -   c. a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person        with Depression if the average relative Q factor about the        average Alpha Frequency is greater than about 8.-   27. The system of embodiment 26 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a    processor.-   28. The system of embodiment 26 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is    hand calculation.-   29. A system of embodiment 23 or 26 wherein the system diagnoses the    person with Depression if the average relative frontal Alpha Power    is greater than the average relative occipital-parietal Alpha Power    and the average relative Q factor is greater than about 8.-   30. A system for diagnosing Schizophrenia, wherein the system    comprises:    -   a. an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person;    -   b. a processing device comprising a processor and internal or        external memory, in order to calculate the average dominant        frequency f_(d) between about 5 Hz and 15 Hz of EEG signals from        at least one EEG channel, the average lower dominant frequency        between about 5 Hz and about f_(d)−1 Hz of EEG signals from at        least one EEG channel, and the average upper dominant frequency        between about f_(d)+1 Hz and about 15 Hz of EEG signals from at        least one EEG channel; and    -   c. a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person        with Schizophrenia if the magnitude of the average power        spectrum from at least one EEG channel at the lower dominant        frequency is at least about 80% the magnitude of the average        power spectrum from at least one EEG channel at the dominant        frequency or the magnitude of the average power spectrum from at        least one EEG channel at the upper dominant frequency is at        least about 80% the magnitude of the average power spectrum from        at least one EEG channel at the dominant frequency.-   31. The system of embodiment 30 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a    processor.-   32. The system of embodiment 30 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is    hand calculation.

While embodiments of the present invention have been shown and describedherein, such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerousvariations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilledin the art without departing from the invention. It should be understoodthat various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention describedherein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended thatthe following claims define the scope of the invention and that systemsand structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents becovered thereby.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for diagnosing autism spectrum disorder(ASD), wherein the system comprises: a. an EEG recording device forrecording the EEG of a person; b. a processing device comprising aprocessor and internal or external memory, in order to calculate theaverage relative Alpha Power of EEG signals from at least one of thefrontal EEG channels and the average relative Alpha Power of EEG signalsfrom at least one of the occipital-parietal EEG channels; and c. adiagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person with ASD ifthe average relative frontal Alpha Power is less than about 10% of theaverage relative occipital-parietal Alpha Power.
 2. The system of claim1 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a processor.
 3. The system of claim1 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is hand calculation.
 4. A system fordiagnosing ASD, wherein the system comprises: a. an EEG recording devicefor recording the EEG of a person; b. a processing device comprising aprocessor and internal or external memory, in order to calculate theaverage relative Alpha Power of EEG signals from at least one of thefrontal EEG channels and the average relative Alpha Power of EEG signalsfrom at least one of the occipital-parietal EEG channels; and c. adiagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person with ASD ifthe average relative frontal Alpha Power is less than about 20% of theaverage relative occipital-parietal Alpha Power and the average relativefrontal Alpha Power is less than about 5%.
 5. The system of claim 4wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a processor.
 6. The system of claim 4wherein the diagnosis mechanism is hand calculation.
 7. A system fordiagnosing ASD, wherein the system comprises: a. an EEG recording devicefor recording the EEG of a person; b. a processing device comprising aprocessor and internal or external memory, in order to calculate theaverage Alpha Frequency of EEG signals from at least one of the frontalEEG channels and the average Alpha Frequency of EEG signals from atleast one of the occipital-parietal EEG channels; and c. a diagnosismechanism where the system diagnoses the person with ASD if the averagefrontal Alpha Frequency is greater than about 0.5 Hz more than theaverage occipital-parietal Alpha Frequency.
 8. The system of claim 7wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a processor.
 9. The system of claim 7wherein the diagnosis mechanism is hand calculation.
 10. The system ofclaim 1 or 4 wherein the system diagnoses the person with ASD if theaverage relative frontal Alpha Power is less than about 10% of theaverage relative occipital-parietal Alpha Power and the average relativefrontal Alpha Power is less than about 5%.
 11. The system of claim 1 or7 wherein the system diagnoses the person with ASD if the averagerelative frontal Alpha Power is less than about 10% of the averagerelative occipital-parietal Alpha Power and the average frontal AlphaFrequency is greater than about 0.5 Hz more than the averageoccipital-parietal Alpha Frequency.
 12. The system of claim 4 or 7wherein the system diagnoses the person with ASD if the average relativefrontal Alpha Power is less than about 20% of the average relativeoccipital-parietal Alpha Power and the average relative frontal AlphaPower is less than about 5% and the average frontal Alpha Frequency isgreater than about 0.5 Hz more than the average occipital-parietal AlphaFrequency.
 13. A system for diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease, wherein thesystem comprises: a. an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of aperson; b. a processing device comprising a processor and internal orexternal memory, in order to calculate the average dominant frequencybetween about 5 Hz and 15 Hz of EEG signals from at least one EEGchannel; and c. a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses theperson with Alzheimer's Disease if the average dominant frequency isless than about 8 Hz.
 14. The system of claim 13 wherein the diagnosismechanism is a processor.
 15. The system of claim 13 wherein thediagnosis mechanism is hand calculation.
 16. A system for diagnosingAlzheimer's Disease, wherein the system comprises: a. an EEG recordingdevice for recording the EEG of a person; b. a processing devicecomprising a processor and internal or external memory, in order tocalculate the average dominant frequency between about 5 Hz and 15 Hz ofEEG signals from at least one EEG channel and the average coherence atthe dominant frequency between the EEG signals from at least one frontalEEG channel and at least one occipital-parietal EEG channel; and c. adiagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses the person withAlzheimer's Disease if the average coherence is less than about 10%. 17.The system of claim 16 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a processor.18. The system of claim 16 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is handcalculation.
 19. The system of claim 13 or 16 wherein the systemdiagnoses the person with Alzheimer's Disease if the dominant frequencyis less than about 8 Hz and the average coherence is less than about10%.
 20. A system for diagnosing Anxiety Disorder, wherein the systemcomprises: a. an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person;b. a processing device comprising a processor and internal or externalmemory, in order to calculate the average entropy of the EEG signalsfrom at least one EEG channel; and c. a diagnosis mechanism where thesystem diagnoses the person with Anxiety Disorder if the average entropyis greater than about 0.7.
 21. The system of claim 20 wherein thediagnosis mechanism is a processor.
 22. The system of claim 20 whereinthe diagnosis mechanism is hand calculation.
 23. A system for diagnosingDepression, wherein the system comprises: a. an EEG recording device forrecording the EEG of a person; b. a processing device comprising aprocessor and internal or external memory, in order to calculate theaverage relative Alpha Power of at least one frontal EEG channel and theaverage relative Alpha Power of at least one occipital-parietal EEGchannel; and c. a diagnosis mechanism where the system diagnoses theperson with Depression if the average relative frontal Alpha Power isgreater than the average relative occipital-parietal Alpha Power. 24.The system of claim 23 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a processor.25. The system of claim 23 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is handcalculation.
 26. A system for diagnosing Depression, wherein the systemcomprises: a. an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person;b. a processing device comprising a processor and internal or externalmemory, in order to calculate the average frontal Alpha Frequency of EEGsignals from at least one frontal EEG channel; and c. a diagnosismechanism where the system diagnoses the person with Depression if theaverage relative Q-factor about the average frontal Alpha Frequency ofEEG signals from at least one frontal EEG channel is greater than about8.
 27. The system of claim 26 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is aprocessor.
 28. The system of claim 26 wherein the diagnosis mechanism ishand calculation.
 29. The system of claim 23 or 26 wherein the systemdiagnoses the person with Depression if the average relative frontalAlpha Power is greater than the average relative occipital-parietalAlpha Power and the average relative Q factor is greater than about 8.30. A system for diagnosing Schizophrenia, wherein the system comprises:a. an EEG recording device for recording the EEG of a person; b. aprocessing device comprising a processor and internal or externalmemory, in order to calculate the average dominant frequency f_(d)between about 5 Hz and 15 Hz of EEG signals from at least one EEGchannel, the average lower dominant frequency between about 5 Hz andabout f_(d)−1 Hz of EEG signals from at least one EEG channel, and theaverage upper dominant frequency between about f_(d)+1 Hz and about 15Hz of EEG signals from at least one EEG channel; and c. a diagnosismechanism where the system diagnoses the person with Schizophrenia ifthe magnitude of the average power spectrum from at least one EEGchannel at the lower dominant frequency is at least about 80% themagnitude of the average power spectrum from at least one EEG channel atthe dominant frequency or the magnitude of the average power spectrumfrom at least one EEG channel at the upper dominant frequency is atleast about 80% the magnitude of the average power spectrum from atleast one EEG channel at the dominant frequency.
 31. The system of claim30 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is a processor.
 32. The system ofclaim 30 wherein the diagnosis mechanism is hand calculation.